Content deleted Content added
correctly placed bracket |
→Terminology: avoid defining a negation of a term ("incompatible") using a negation of a property, and defining the term as a negation of its negaton |
||
Line 8:
;string: an element of <math>2^{<\omega}</math>. In other words a finite approximation to a real.
;
;condition: An element in a notion of forcing. We say a condition <math>p</math> is stronger than a condition <math>q</math> just when <math>q \succ_P p</math>.
;
;incompatible conditions (noted <math>p\mid q</math>): <math>p</math> is compatible with <math>q</math> if they are not incompatible. <!-- Sometimes we will use '''consistent''' as a synonym for compatible. --> ;Filter : A subset <math>F</math> of a notion of forcing <math>P</math> is a filter if <math>p,q \in F \implies p \nmid q</math> and <math>p \in F \land q \succ_P p \implies q \in F</math>. In other words a filter is a compatible set of conditions closed under weakening of conditions.
;Ultrafilter
;
Note that for Cohen forcing <math>\succ_{C}</math> is the '''reverse''' of the containment relation. This leads to an unfortunate notational confusion where some recursion theorists reverse the direction of the forcing partial order (exchanging <math>\succ_P</math> with <math>\prec_P</math> which is more natural for Cohen forcing but is at odds with the notation used in set theory.
|