Content deleted Content added
m ce |
m →Criticism: there were many defoliants used during the war, so this is more correct (the -> a) |
||
Line 14:
==Criticism==
2,4-D was one of the main ingredients of [[Agent Orange]],
General criticism is aimed at the concept of using herbicides with herbicide-resistant crops as it is likely that herbicide-resistant weeds will develop naturally in response. Thus agriculture moves from substance to substance in an ongoing "chemical arms race".<ref name=freese >{{cite web| url=http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/fsr_24-d.pdf| author=[[Bill Freese]] |title=Going Backwards: Dow’s 2,4-D-Resistant Crops and a More Toxic Future| publisher=[[Center for Food Safety]]| title=”Agent Orange” Crops: The Next Stage in the Chemical Arms Race| accessdate=May 3, 2014}}</ref><ref name=gillam>{{cite web| url=http://www.cornucopia.org/2013/01/dows-controversial-new-gmo-corn-delayed-amid-protests/| author= Carey Gillam| title=Dow’s Controversial New GMO Corn Delayed Amid Protests|publisher=The Cornucopia Institute| date=January 28, 2013 |accessdate=May 3, 2014}}</ref> Critics point out that the process never ends and is not sustainable.<ref name=freese/> Instead, they reject herbicides and pesticides in favor of the use of non-toxic, sustainable methods to control pests and enrich the soil.<ref name=freese/>
|