|
*The 1RR notice is quite prominent on both the editnotice of the article, and yet you made 2 reverts in 24 minutes. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] ([[User talk:Courcelles|talk]]) 21:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
{{reply to|Courcelles}}
==Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Lr0^^k==
{{unblock|reason= I was aware of policy, reverts fall under [[WP:NOT3RR]], as suspected socks involved [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim]], subsequent reverts by friends/people called upon by sock included reverts of constructive edits. Once the reverting of constructive material stopped, no reverts done. Please see page {{History|2006 Lebanon War|History}}. Discussion of 'contested' additions (initiated by sock) currently undergoing on talk page. I would like to appeal block, and in the worst case a simple 'topic ban', as all edits on this site constructive. Thank you [[User:Lr0^^k|495656778774 ]] ([[User talk:Lr0^^k#top|talk]]) 2122: 5708, 21 August 2015 (UTC) }}▼
<small>''Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Enforcement|here]]. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action. <p>To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see [[WP:UNINVOLVED]]).''</small>
; Appealing user : {{userlinks|Lr0^^k}} – [[User:Lr0^^k|495656778774 ]] ([[User talk:Lr0^^k#top|talk]]) 21:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
; Sanction being appealed : Block
; Administrator imposing the sanction : {{admin|Courcelles}}
; Notification of that administrator : {{Ping|Courcelles}}. Notified via [[Template:Ping]], {{diff2|677222538}}
===Statement by Lr0^^k===
▲I was aware of policy, reverts fall under [[WP:NOT3RR]], as suspected socks involved [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim]], subsequent reverts by friends/people called upon by sock included reverts of constructive edits. Once the reverting of constructive material stopped, no reverts done. Please see page {{History|2006 Lebanon War|History}}. Discussion of 'contested' additions (initiated by sock) currently undergoing on talk page. I would like to appeal block, and in the worst case a simple 'topic ban', as all edits on this site constructive. Thank you [[User:Lr0^^k|495656778774 ]] ([[User talk:Lr0^^k#top|talk]]) 21:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
===Statement by Courcelles===
===Statement by (involved editor 1)===
===Statement by (involved editor 2)===
===Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Lr0^^k ===
===Result of the appeal by Lr0^^k===
:''This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.''
<!-- When closing this request (once there is a consensus) use {{hat|Result}} / {{hab}} if at AE, or an archive/discussion box template if on AN, inform the user on their talk page and note it in the discretionary sanctions log below where their sanctions is logged. -->
*
== Regarding your edit to ISIL ==
| 