Revision as of 00:24, 22 August 2015 edit Djembayz (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 27,200 edits →Mid-volume transaction output: delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:32, 24 August 2015 edit undo Gene93k (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 468,367 edits Placing notification for listing at WP:DELSORT (delsort.js) Next edit →
Line 11: '''Delete''' I agree with [[User:JoeHebda\|JoeHebda]] above. Not to mention that it's completely unsourced. I do not believe this could become a section in another article to be honest; and if it were to be considered for that; it would need a massive overhaul and some sort of sourcing. [[User:Undead warrior\|The Undead Never Die]] ([[User talk:Undead warrior\|talk]]) 04:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC) '''Delete''', fails [[WP:RS]], [[WP:NOTDIC]]. Appears too specific a term to stand as its own section in existing printing articles. --[[User:Djembayz\|Djembayz]] ([[User talk:Djembayz\|talk]]) 00:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC) :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business\|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology\|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 18:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)</small>

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid-volume transaction output: Difference between revisions