Revision as of 23:22, 3 September 2015 edit Fruitloop11 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 916 edits →Python reticulatus length ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:30, 3 September 2015 edit undo Fruitloop11 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 916 edits →Python reticulatus length: adding more Next edit →
Line 522: ::::What is the big deal here? Your source is still there ~~were~~whil mine isn't. I have played be your rules "going to the talk page" and "listening to everything" you have to say. You started this cause you didn't want me posting the 32 foot 9 1/2 record as claimed by Guinness? Well guess what it's still not there. like really every source you have posted is still there. ~~while~~Also ~~mine~~this isdiscussion can go on for months long after we have gone on our way. ~~not~~--[[User:Fruitloop11\|Fruitloop11]] ([[User talk:Fruitloop11\|talk]]) 23:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC) ::My previous comments notwithstanding, I agree that a discussion of typical and maximum length/size is of keen interest to readers and should be included in the article. I just think we need to strive to provide the most realistic and useful information that we can, add all appropriate caveats, and be careful to avoid tabloid-level reliance on dubious unverifiable reports that stretch the bounds of credulity. —[[User:BarrelProof\|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof\|talk]]) 06:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Reticulated python: Difference between revisions