Content deleted Content added
Line 223:
I support merging.. I may do that if I bother.. I'm not an expert on CORBA, and do not really know "Servant" in CORBA or similar context, but seem belongs here and not needing a separate page.. It's been a year.. Either nobody cares to much about this/that article and/or it supports CORBA as "dead".. [[User:Comp.arch|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch|talk]]) 16:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
:CORBA is not "dead". I was on a mailing list just yesterday where people were talking about it quite a lot in relation to a Semantic Web project. In any case even if CORBA were "dead" it was still extremely influential in the history of IT so the articles about it should be accurate. BTW, if you don't even know what a Servant is I don't see how you can responsibly edit that part of the article without first doing some serious study on the topic. I DO know what a Servant is but I don't feel I understand it well enough to edit further without doing more research first. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 18:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
::You are right, I'm not sure what Servant is there, but it would not disallow merging to this article? Shown by "(CORBA)" in the title.. I'm not saying CORBA isn't notable, it is and I remember it. This article is 30,094 bytes and there is room, and the other article is very short and it has hardly been edited since 2009 and not at all since the merge proposal a year ago.. Even if CORBA isn't dead, CORBA is notable, but [[Servant (CORBA)]] on it's own? I doubt it. [[User:Comp.arch|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch|talk]]) 21:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
| |||