Revision as of 04:48, 27 July 2006 edit Scs (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 10,924 edits →Miscellaneous commentary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:45, 7 August 2006 edit undo Shayl (talk \| contribs) 5,910 edits bypassing cross-namespace redirect, Replaced: good article → good article, using AWB Next edit →
Line 7: Not enough citations. [[User:Ideogram\|Ideogram]] 08:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC) '''[[Wikipedia:Good ~~article~~articles\|Good]], but not [[Wikipedia:Featured ~~article~~articles\|featured]].''' I believe it could be a [[Wikipedia:Good articles\|good article]], but it has to cite more sources to be featured. Also, I'm not entirely comfortable with how the article covers C. '''This is an encyclopedia article on C, not a tutorial.''' The ''"hello world" example'' should not be so long. [[User:70.17.41.123\|70.17.41.123]] 17:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC) Comprehensive, and packed with useful information. But it sorely needs inline citations, both for some of the more controversial claims related to influence and usage, and for the history and philosophy sections. --[[User:Allan McInnes\|Allan McInnes]] <small>([[User talk:Allan McInnes\|talk]])</small> 23:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article review/C (programming language): Difference between revisions