Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart File System: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:15, 3 October 2015

Revision as of 06:42, 3 October 2015

Line 19:

:File systems are notable as components of notable systems and an important part of a system's historical development. See also [[Amiga Old File System]], [[Amiga Fast File System]], and [[Professional File System]] for the Amiga which would also have to be deleted. [[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma|talk]]) 06:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' AfD talks a bunch about notability, but the underlying policy behind all this is [[WP:V|verifiability]]; if there are enough third-party sources to be able to verify an article, that should be considered notability enough (and this is pretty much exactly what [[WP:GNG]] says!), and if there aren't, you'll never be able to write a verifiable article and thus it should be deleted. Seeing the conversation above made me fear that the article couldn't be verified (a one-sentence mention isn't really enough), but although some of the existing citations are dubious, there seems to be enough valid ones around that it's possible to write a verifiable article (perhaps a shorter one than currently, though). --[[User:ais523|ais523]] 06:42, 3 October 2015 ([[User:ais523|U]][[User talk:ais523|T]][[Special:Contributions/Ais523|C]])