Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEX Robotics Design System: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under Events (FWDS)
Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Technology|list of Technology-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 06:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Events|list of Events-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 06:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
 
*'''Keep''': This article seems reasonable for overall inclusion. I have quibbles with the text of it (particularly the bit mentioning pricing), but a robotics system targeted at young people that seems to have multiple organizations using its system for competitions involving many hundreds of schools meets any rational definition of notability. The fact that it has come to the notice of NASA and a number of high-level offices of state governments seems to corroborate that. There is no large corpus of scholarly writing on this system, but that's to be expected of a production product. I would definitely keep this, but flag the article for a more objective perspective.