Revision as of 04:23, 11 October 2015 edit 69.204.153.39 (talk) software notability ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:40, 11 October 2015 edit undo LjL (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,008 edits →Smart File System Next edit →
Line 36: *'''Delete'''. Just because AmigaOS is notable does not mean that all its components are. [[Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS\|OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]] is not a valid argument for keeping an article. Ultimately, I'm not seeing any convincing evidence at all that this article meets [[WP:NSOFTWARE]]. All mentions in books are brief one-liners. The mentions I found elsewhere on the web were from obscure and likely non-reliable sources. This certainly does not satisfy the requirement that the software be the ''subject'' (not merely mentioned) in multiple manuals, reviews, instruction books, etc. --[[User:Biblioworm\|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''Biblio'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Biblioworm\|<span style="color:#6F4E37">'''''worm'''''</span>]] 18:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC) :: Please be mindful that [[WP:NSOFTWARE]] is an essay -- not a guideline, policy, or rule. It has been rejected as a policy in the past as it lacks community consensus, which (as its header pointedly mentions) makes it not terribly applicable in these discussions.--[[Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39\|69.204.153.39]] ([[User talk:69.204.153.39\|talk]]) 04:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC) ::: But maybe it only lacks local consensus but it has global consensus... </sarcasm> [[User:LjL\|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL\|talk]]) 11:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart File System: Difference between revisions