Revision as of 07:18, 12 October 2015 edit Intgr (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 32,266 edits Biblio's statement applies just as well for WP:GNG ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:15, 12 October 2015 edit undo LjL (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,008 edits Comment: added references Next edit →
Line 38: ::: But maybe it only lacks local consensus but it has global consensus... </sarcasm> [[User:LjL\|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL\|talk]]) 11:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC) :::Biblio's statement applies just as well for [[WP:GNG]], so the argument still stands. (I think people should stop using subject-specific guidelines entirely. All subject-specific guidelines are largely a restatement of [[WP:GNG]] along with arbitrary shortcuts, that some people assumed would only include clearly notable instances) -- [[user:intgr\|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr\|[talk]]]</small> 07:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC) *'''Comment''' - I've added another two sources, one to an article on the ''Total Amiga'' magazine elaborating on how to make the best use of hard drives, and including some information about SFS previously not on our article (deleted files directory), and another to a mention on [[Ars Technica]] claiming that (as of 2008, when the article was written) the filesystem was still in active use among "Amiga fans". --[[User:LjL\|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL\|talk]]) 12:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart File System: Difference between revisions