Content deleted Content added
m fixing image, order |
|||
Line 1:
See [[User:Gimmetrow]] for the userpage. (Warning: may contain test scripting)
I'm sorry that I've been reverting information on Jason Earle's article. It's just that the people who work on that article have come to a consent that he was born on 4/26/77 and we also have proof that he was born in '77. I'll stop, I was just trying to put up the right information. ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 18:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC))▼
:Well, that's because that ip was mine. I just forgot to log on. Well to me personally I would trust ancestry.com over tv.com. It is possible that the information could be corrupted or incorrect, but to me its more likely that tv.com is incorrect. That's my personal opinion. ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 18:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC))▼
:: That is interesting. I'm not sure on that case. Who was the celebrity? Well with Jason Earles birthday the birthday agrees with more websites than ones that contradict it. I've seen at least 4 or 5 other websites that give his birthday as 4/26/77. The only sites I have found that say 4/26/85 are tv.com and his resume in which he could have easily fudged his birthday to get more callbacks. I guess it depends on the certain situation. Where the 2 newspaper articles and the biography really realiable? ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 19:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC))▼
:::Yeah, I see where you are coming from. I googled Maria Shriver and on hollywood.com they list her being born on 11/6/55.( http://www.hollywood.com/celebs/detail/id/187566). It is possible that the public records can be incorrect, but there could also be two Maria Shrivers. When I searched for Jason Earles on http://www.familytreelegends.com/records/39461, there was only one Jason Earles listed with the birthdate 4/26/77, which agrees with almost all sites, except for tv.com and his resume. A possible scenario is that there might be two Maria Shrivers. ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 21:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC))▼
==McKenna==
Line 202 ⟶ 192:
==
▲I'm sorry that I've been reverting information on Jason Earle's article. It's just that the people who work on that article have come to a consent that he was born on 4/26/77 and we also have proof that he was born in '77. I'll stop, I was just trying to put up the right information. ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 18:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC))
▲:Well, that's because that ip was mine. I just forgot to log on. Well to me personally I would trust ancestry.com over tv.com. It is possible that the information could be corrupted or incorrect, but to me its more likely that tv.com is incorrect. That's my personal opinion. ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 18:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC))
Fair enough, Gimmetrow. Was rather frustrated with earlier users reverts that I couldn't understand the reasoning for. Seemed NPOV to me as one can't really compare the anti hiv argument to creationism, flat-earthism, or many other lunacies. I admit I got a chuckle out of it. That said, your reversion was right for the reason you stated. I'll look for something, either tomorrow or next week, as I'm moving to Maryland on Sunday.▼
▲:: That is interesting. I'm not sure on that case. Who was the celebrity? Well with Jason Earles birthday the birthday agrees with more websites than ones that contradict it. I've seen at least 4 or 5 other websites that give his birthday as 4/26/77. The only sites I have found that say 4/26/85 are tv.com and his resume in which he could have easily fudged his birthday to get more callbacks. I guess it depends on the certain situation. Where the 2 newspaper articles and the biography really realiable? ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 19:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC))
▲:::Yeah, I see where you are coming from. I googled Maria Shriver and on hollywood.com they list her being born on 11/6/55.( http://www.hollywood.com/celebs/detail/id/187566). It is possible that the public records can be incorrect, but there could also be two Maria Shrivers. When I searched for Jason Earles on http://www.familytreelegends.com/records/39461, there was only one Jason Earles listed with the birthdate 4/26/77, which agrees with almost all sites, except for tv.com and his resume. A possible scenario is that there might be two Maria Shrivers. ([[User:Mward87|Mward87]] 21:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC))
== Hiv ==
▲Fair enough, Gimmetrow. Was rather frustrated with earlier users reverts that I couldn't understand the reasoning for. Seemed NPOV to me as one can't really compare the anti hiv argument to creationism, flat-earthism, or many other lunacies. I admit I got a chuckle out of it. That said, your reversion was right for the reason you stated. I'll look for something, either tomorrow or next week, as I'm moving to Maryland on Sunday. {{unsigned|69.175.37.198}} 01:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
==Gay Kingdom==
Line 283 ⟶ 281:
:Some have suggested that [[Aesthetics]] is close to ready for FAC, but I certainly can't put the kind of work into it that Lacatosias has into Putnam. It has some in-line references, but leaves most of that for the end references (which seems cleaner to me on a front-page style basic article, but I can't imagine that arguement flying). Further I suck at copy-editing, there are probably hordes of issues I'm not seeing. [[User:Bmorton3|Bmorton3]] 15:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
===exclusion===
Sorry I didn't mean to exclude you. Thanks for pointing this out[[User:Dbuckner|Dbuckner]] 14:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
=== Lacatosias ===
I thought he had completed the work. Also good wikiquette would say that a comment in the summary like - beginning major rewrite would help give notice - in fact - decent edit summaries in general could have avoided this issue --<font color="#06C">[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]]</font> 17:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Line 299 ⟶ 297:
== Image ==
The [[:Image:Priestly ordination.jpg]] has been clarified by me. You can use it freely (for objective articles that is.... :-)... ).[[User:Smith2006|Smith2006]] 10:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
| |||