Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/October: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:24, 31 October 2015

Revision as of 20:50, 1 November 2015

Line 15:

There are also seven counties without any stubs at all: the counties of Dodge, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Nobles, Stevens, Traverse, Waseca. While some won't be particularly well populated I still think having them upmerged into {{tl|Minnesota-geo-stub}} would help for futureproofing. (And though I don't have specific numbers, there were plenty for Morrison and a fair few for Mille Lacs & Waseca, which would mean the tags were more densely populated than some of the existing upmerged ones...!) Any input on how to proceed (other than the obvious speedy candidate) would be most welcome. [[User:Buttons to Push Buttons|Buttons to Push Buttons]] ([[User talk:Buttons to Push Buttons|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Buttons to Push Buttons|contribs]]) 14:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

:Okay, been 5 days without objection, so I created the upmerged ones and the speedy eligible one, but I think the best model to follow is that for [[:Category:California geography stubs]] -- well-defined regions given their own category, which then have the upmerged templates feeding into them. As such I'll ask someone from [[WP:MINNESOTA]] if they could offer any advice as to how best we can sort out regional groupings... [[User:Buttons to Push Buttons|Buttons to Push Buttons]] ([[User talk:Buttons to Push Buttons|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Buttons to Push Buttons|contribs]]) 20:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

===Aussie Rules competition stubs===