Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2015/October: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:07, 5 November 2015

Revision as of 00:47, 6 November 2015

Line 14:

::This seems like a fine idea. I wish I could say there was a simple and generally agreed upon way to divide Minnesota up into regions but, sadly, there isn't any that I'm aware of. If you wanted to just be bold about it, [http://www.health.state.mn.us/oep/contact/teamsregions.html this map] through the Minnesota Department of Health meshes with my conception of it and also seems to fit some of the regions noted over in [[Geography of Minnesota]]. [[User:Nsteffel|Nsteffel]] ([[User talk:Nsteffel|talk]]) 18:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

::Having just run through some of that category to do some WikiProject tagging, another idea that came to mind would be splitting it out thematically. It looks like most of the stubs are either lakes, rivers/streams or populated places. Perhaps dividing it up along those sorts of criteria would be a little more cut-and-dried and still get things down to more manageable sizes? [[User:Nsteffel|Nsteffel]] ([[User talk:Nsteffel|talk]]) 22:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:::IMHO we should stick to using regions, however defined, as that's the way the rest of the US geo stubs are sorted. The trick, as you say, is finding out what the regions are according to reliable sources. Just saying. [[User:Pegship|Pegship]] ([[User talk:Pegship|talk]]) 00:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

===Aussie Rules competition stubs===