Content deleted Content added
→Example: oh never mind, I can probably figure it out |
→Transclusion did not bring references along too: new section |
||
Line 13:
It seems to me that <nowiki><onlyinclude></nowiki> is incompatible with labeled section transclusion, i.e., if you use one, you can't use the other. If there is only one section to be "onlyincluded", then using <nowiki><onlyinclude></nowiki> tags is sufficient for the purpose, and there is no benefit to converting those to a single labeled section. Only if one wants to have multiple labeled sections on the same page, does using labeled section transclusion become worthwhile. Is that correct? [[User:Wbm1058|Wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058|talk]]) 12:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
:Sounds about right. Never tested the interaction between {{tag|onlyinclude|o}} and {{xtag|section}} but I would not recommend mixing them. --<span style="color:Turquoise">''''' [[User:Gadget850|Gadget850]]'''''<sup>[[User talk:Gadget850| ''talk'']]</sup></span> 14:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
== Transclusion did not bring references along too ==
{{help}}
{{u|Gadget850}}
Using the instructions at '''[[Help:Labeled section transclusion#Section marking]]''' I was happy my two section transclusions worked on '''[[Planned Parenthood]]''' but was dismayed to find it broke the references that were included in the two sections. The transclusion did not transclude the references too.
Here are the two sections I transcluded to:
:[[Planned Parenthood#Center for Medical Progress videos]]
:[[Planned Parenthood#Violence by anti-abortion activists]]
Ping me back. Cheers! <code>{{u|[[User:Checkingfax|Checkingfax]]}} {[[User talk:Checkingfax|Talk]]}</code> 23:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
|