Indecs Content Model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:36, 11 November 2015

Revision as of 05:57, 12 November 2015

Line 1:

{{redirect|Indecs|the journal title abbreviated to INDECS|Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems}}

{{ref improverefimprove|date=May 2014}}

{{lowercase}}

Line 46:

* [http://www.doi.org/ Digital Object Identifier System] metadata schemes

One of the deliverables of the indecs project was a specification for a Directory of Parties. This led to a subsequent project, Interparty,<ref>http://www.interparty.org</ref>, funded under the European Commission's Information Society Technologies Programme, to design and specify a network to support interoperability of party identification (for both natural and corporate names) across different domains, building on the indecs principles. InterParty was not proposed as a replacement for existing schemes for the identification of participants in the intellectual property ___domain (e.g. national library name authority files or systems oriented towards the needs of rights licensing) but as a means of effecting their interoperation. Some of its conclusions have been used elsewhere, e.g. in the work on the proposed ISO ISNI<ref>http://isni.org/</ref> (International Standard Name Identifier).

Other developments are continuing, notably through the OntologyX semantic engineering tools and services from [http://www.rightscom.com Rightscom]. The approach also has much in common with the [http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/index.html CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM)], an ontology for cultural heritage information, and the [[FRBR|Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)]] model in the library world.