Content deleted Content added
→definition is ridiculous: Comment |
→definition is ridiculous: +comment |
||
Line 216:
:I am retired editor but i have made a pledge to provide requests for comments when asked. Unfortunately the point about references can not be by passed however the definition of references of taggers is generally they do not understand each topic and think that we need 1000 references, but the Wikipedia policy on reference does not say we need lot but for anything written it must be backed up by a reliable third party source. You are quite entitle to rewrite it using your knowledge but you would need to provide a reference that backs up what your saying in this day and age finding reference is not as hard as it was 10 years ago granted this topic will have less references than say a well published subject but there is references. My suggestion is to make a sub test page of the article and then write up your changes how you think the page should be and then request for comment on that as long as it complies with principle standards of Wikipedia then it can not be objected you will find there is some editors who will quote obscure policies to block you but these policies are all derived from the core policies which i can quote later if there is issues. Good luck on the rewrite as it does need a rewrite as with a lot of other articles also if you think the subject matter ie the title is not write then suggest a new one and we can have it moved if supported[[User:Andrewcrawford|<font color="Light Blue">Andrewcrawford</font>]] ([[User talk:Andrewcrawford|<small>talk</small>]] - [[Special:Contributions/Andrewcrawford|<small>contrib</small>]]) 17:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
::these "obscure policies" are why i stopped editing. <b>... </b><span style="background-color: #11cbc4;width:52px;height:16px;font-size:12px;p{text-align:center}">[[user:avriette|jane avriette]]:[[user_talk:avriette|talk]]</span> 20:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
| |||