Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILNumerics.Net: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
re |
Numbers303 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14:
:*{{Ping|Codename Lisa}} It is the same software. You can find out easily by reading the content of the referenced article. ILNumerics were developed and published under open source license several years. This is (and will always be) available still - free of charge. See the references to nuget in the reworked version of the article. Thanks [[User:Numbers303|Numbers303]] ([[User talk:Numbers303|talk]]) 14:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
::*I am not sure if I understood you correctly. Are you saying the current company stole the open-source version (and is now using Wikipedia as a free advertisement mechanism)? Or are you saying the opposite? Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 15:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
::* Hm, I don't know if I understand your question. Do you see evidence of an illegal act? Where do you see advertisement or other violations of WP guidelines in the reworked version of the article? Please be specific. Thanks [[User:Numbers303|Numbers303]] ([[User talk:Numbers303|talk]]) 15:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. Thanks [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] for bringing up the issue! The article indeed sounded a little advertising before. However, it would have been obvious by little research that a deletion would at least be controversal. Also, it is better to give the chance for improvement and discussion before considering speedy deletion. I appreciate your effort in helping to keep WP clean and in trying to be effective. Hoever, most parts of the article already contained useful information. I have just addressed the remaining issues and reworked the article. [[User:Numbers303|Numbers303]] ([[User talk:Numbers303|talk]]) 14:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
| |||