Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILNumerics.Net: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Numbers303 - "" |
Numbers303 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 18:
* '''Keep'''. Thanks [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] for bringing up the issue! The article indeed sounded a little advertising before. However, it would have been obvious by little research that a deletion would at least be controversal. Also, it is better to give the chance for improvement and discussion before considering speedy deletion. I appreciate your effort in helping to keep WP clean and in trying to be effective. Hoever, most parts of the article already contained useful information. I have just addressed the remaining issues and reworked the article. [[User:Numbers303|Numbers303]] ([[User talk:Numbers303|talk]]) 14:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
:* After reworking the article and adding several references to reliable and independent sources, these references have been deleted by [[User:Qwertyus]] with the reason: "popularity is unsubstantiated; sources are either self-published or affiliated, and don't actually establish popularity". This statement is not true. I will re-add the references<ref>https://www.nuget.org/packages/ILNumerics/</ref><ref>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/ilnumerics</ref><ref>https://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/9a67b49d-b0b2-4073-97fd-3f18ba08cc61</ref> in order to proof the visibility of the project. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Numbers303|Numbers303]] ([[User talk:Numbers303|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Numbers303|contribs]]) 15:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:* A list of alternative projects were added in order to make the topic even more neutral and objective. However, the whole section has been deleted for unclear reasons: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ILNumerics.Net&diff=next&oldid=692247639 "none of this is reliably sourced by third-party comparisons"].
|