Revision as of 18:53, 24 November 2015 edit H3st (talk \| contribs) 59 edits Suggest merge ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:43, 24 November 2015 edit undo Rwessel (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 7,337 edits →Merge? Next edit →
Line 9: Based on the lack of sources and confusion regarding the term, it seems like this article would be better to merge into [[interpreted language]] and possibly [[dynamic typing]]. As the article appears right now, it reads like it was written by [[LISP]] users who want an article fitting their vocabulary, rather than something that fits with the other compsci/[[Programming language theory\|PLT]] articles. [[User:H3st\|h3st]] ([[User talk:H3st\|talk]]) 18:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC) :No, the notion of a dynamic programming language is not really related to interpretation, nor really to dynamic typing (although both are common in dynamic languages). OTOH while the article was pretty incomplete before, it's still incomplete, but rather Lisp heavy. [[User:Rwessel\|Rwessel]] ([[User talk:Rwessel\|talk]]) 20:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC) = What exactly is a dynamic programming language ? =

Talk:Dynamic programming language: Difference between revisions