Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Informing of edit warring report on behalf of user who filed it (who apparently forgot to notify) |
||
Line 104:
you changed facts claiming to be wrong but when ask about your basis or reference you are unable to provide. You are inconsistent with your edits, first the 1630 you change to 1830 then now changed it to 1790 and deleted some references. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mateothehistorian|Mateothehistorian]] ([[User talk:Mateothehistorian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mateothehistorian|contribs]]) 23:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Learn have to make comments. Stop putting you [[WP:CB]] in real pages. You have any basis on your nonsense – you ignore reality and choose instead a web blog. De Medina (and Blair & Robertson) had nothing about Lawis, obvious because there is not settlement there. And you have least three different people, unless one man is about 200 years old. And I've been there to Madridejos many times. - [[:en:User:Unbuttered Parsnip|<span style="color:slategray">Unbuttered parsnip</span>]] ([[:en:User talk:Unbuttered Parsnip|talk]]) mytime= Wed 07:53, wikitime= 23:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:LjL|LjL]] ([[User talk:LjL|talk]]) 23:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
|