Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILNumerics.Net: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:03, 27 November 2015

Revision as of 16:17, 27 November 2015

Line 1:

===[[ILNumerics.Net]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

* '''Keep''' To the uninformed Delete voters, it was the first open source quality piece of engineering we took on and that you probably have not seen in performance and made available for free. The firm and project has supported a notable act of furthering good causes, in free grants of 2008 as well as GPL terms beforehand and thereafter. The arguments pointing to commercial nature are dubious at best as the piece of firmware, trackingware and trojanware most of the skeptics, and myself too, carry is commercial in nature too and described on WP. Did you argue to delete them? <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.223.132.167|31.223.132.167]] ([[User talk:31.223.132.167|talk]]) 23:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

* '''Delete''' There's many other libraries in this field available as open source. ILnumerics is a commercial product. They will have other ways of advertising. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Harbran|Harbran]] ([[User talk:Harbran|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harbran|contribs]]) 19:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

* '''Keep'''. [[Special:Contributions/91.44.79.238|91.44.79.238]] ([[User talk:91.44.79.238|talk]]) 11:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC) Clearly, ILNumerics is scientifically relevant – there even exists a diploma thesis about it: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/255988828_ILNumerics_-_High_Performance_Computing_With_.NET_-_Enabling_.NET_as_efficient_platform_for_numerical_computations_and_visualizations It belongs to the MATLAB/R family of scientific computation software all present at Wikipedia helping students and researchers all over the world to solve their problems. Deletion would only make it harder for interested people to find and compare the few programs in this area.

* '''Keep'''. I can’t see any advertising in this article <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.172.128.106|212.172.128.106]] ([[User talk:212.172.128.106|talk]]) 15:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:{{la|ILNumerics.Net}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILNumerics.Net|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 23#{{anchorencode:ILNumerics.Net}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ILNumerics.Net Stats]</span>)

Line 30 ⟶ 21:

:* A list of alternative projects were added in order to make the topic even more neutral and objective. However, the whole section has been deleted for unclear reasons: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ILNumerics.Net&diff=next&oldid=692247639 "none of this is reliably sourced by third-party comparisons"]. [[User:Numbers303|Numbers303]] ([[User talk:Numbers303|talk]]) 15:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

*'''Delete for now''' as the best I found were some News and browsers links, certainly nothing better for a better article. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 06:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

* '''Keep''' To the uninformed Delete voters, it was the first open source quality piece of engineering we took on and that you probably have not seen in performance and made available for free. The firm and project has supported a notable act of furthering good causes, in free grants of 2008 as well as GPL terms beforehand and thereafter. The arguments pointing to commercial nature are dubious at best as the piece of firmware, trackingware and trojanware most of the skeptics, and myself too, carry is commercial in nature too and described on WP. Did you argue to delete them? <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.223.132.167|31.223.132.167]] ([[User talk:31.223.132.167|talk]]) 23:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

* '''Delete''' There's many other libraries in this field available as open source. ILnumerics is a commercial product. They will have other ways of advertising. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Harbran|Harbran]] ([[User talk:Harbran|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harbran|contribs]]) 19:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|Harbran}}

* '''Keep'''. [[Special:Contributions/91.44.79.238|91.44.79.238]] ([[User talk:91.44.79.238|talk]]) 11:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC) Clearly, ILNumerics is scientifically relevant – there even exists a diploma thesis about it: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/255988828_ILNumerics_-_High_Performance_Computing_With_.NET_-_Enabling_.NET_as_efficient_platform_for_numerical_computations_and_visualizations It belongs to the MATLAB/R family of scientific computation software all present at Wikipedia helping students and researchers all over the world to solve their problems. Deletion would only make it harder for interested people to find and compare the few programs in this area. {{spa|91.44.79.238}}

* '''Keep'''. I can’t see any advertising in this article <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.172.128.106|212.172.128.106]] ([[User talk:212.172.128.106|talk]]) 15:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|212.172.128.106}}