Revision as of 04:31, 3 December 2015 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,450,069 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program/Archive 1) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:06, 4 December 2015 edit undo Gnugnug (talk \| contribs) 39 edits →Relevance of New Shepard launch Next edit →
Line 87: : Yes, I completely agree. At this point in time, the Blue Origin results are more relevant to the other suborbital tourism players like Virgin Galactic and XCOR Aerospace. --[[User:IanOsgood\|IanOsgood]] ([[User talk:IanOsgood\|talk]]) 22:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC) : I concur. While interesting to many, the Blue Origin test program is both for a very different purpose than the SpaceX orbital booster as well as unrelated to SpaceX' own program, as is perhaps obvious by a clean up edit I made and edit comment I left recently. It fits in Wikipedia. Just not ''this'' article. [[User:N2e\|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e\|talk]]) 00:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC) :: Thanks for confirming. I've made the change. [[User:Gnugnug\|Gnugnug]] ([[User talk:Gnugnug\|talk]]) 11:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program: Difference between revisions