Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potion (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:21, 11 December 2015

Revision as of 15:38, 14 December 2015

Line 8:

* '''keep''' Whether it took off or not isn't at issue (see [[Ford Edsel]]). What's more important is whether anyone paid attention to it doing it. As the author was [[why the lucky stiff|_why]], that's likely to generate interest from the outset.

: As to whether it "took off", then it has already. It's used by at least one group of drone flyers for image processing as it's fast, tiny and expressive for contemporary "what the cool kids are writing" coding style. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 22:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

:: '''comment''': Have these drone flyers (or anyone else) publicly written anything that mentions that they are using the potion programming language? Dear [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]], do you have a name for this group or anyone in it? Even a few blog posts that don't qualify as [[Wikipedia:Reliable source]]s would lead me to support keeping this article a little longer -- that would convince me that there is a good chance this language will meet the [[Wikipedia: Notability]] guideline. Alas, I find it difficult to search for people using potion, because autocorrection tries to "help me" by giving me a bunch of irrelevant pages about finding ''position''. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] ([[User talk:DavidCary|talk]]) 15:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)