Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potion (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
request for more information |
→Potion (programming language): delete |
||
Line 9:
: As to whether it "took off", then it has already. It's used by at least one group of drone flyers for image processing as it's fast, tiny and expressive for contemporary "what the cool kids are writing" coding style. [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 22:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
:: '''comment''': Have these drone flyers (or anyone else) publicly written anything that mentions that they are using the potion programming language? Dear [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]], do you have a name for this group or anyone in it? Even a few blog posts that don't qualify as [[Wikipedia:Reliable source]]s would lead me to support keeping this article a little longer -- that would convince me that there is a good chance this language will meet the [[Wikipedia: Notability]] guideline. Alas, I find it difficult to search for people using potion, because autocorrection tries to "help me" by giving me a bunch of irrelevant pages about finding ''position''. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] ([[User talk:DavidCary|talk]]) 15:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' if it is discussed in independent reliable sources, it is well hidden. I did not find anything with GoogleScholar. A lot of the hits were typos for "portion", and there were several for "Magic Potion", a ___domain specific meta-Language. I did find papers on GoogleScholar mentioning both Michael Fogus and Reini Urban, but none dealing with Potion. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. It does sound like an interesting language and I recommend Reini Urban's summary [http://perl11.org/potion/ here] (not an independet source). --[[User:Bejnar|Bejnar]] ([[User talk:Bejnar|talk]]) 18:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
| |||