Revision as of 12:27, 23 December 2015 edit The Anome (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 260,152 edits →What happens to Falcon 9 Flight 20's booster now?: more ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:27, 23 December 2015 edit undo Tlhslobus (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 15,068 edits →Maintenance + unmanned: new section Next edit →
Line 91: == What happens to Falcon 9 Flight 20's booster now? == After its landing, I'd imagine that Falcon 9 Flight 20's booster will now be torn down by SpaceX into its component parts for analysis, but that's just my guess. Do we have any authoritative/[[WP:RS]] information about what SpaceX's plans are for this? -- [[User:The Anome\|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome\|talk]]) 12:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC) == Maintenance + unmanned == High maintenance costs ruined the economics of the reusable Space Shuttle. But that was presumably at least partly due to the Shuttle having to be extra safe to carry people, so that Falcon 9 may perhaps avoid similar problems if its payloads stay unmanned. Are there no reliable sources discussing these matters, or if there are, shouldn't they appear in the article? (The Space Shuttle's problems meant that I assumed Falcon 9 was just hype until I worked out the above arguments, but if those arguments are correct I shouldn't have had to try to work them out for myself, and neither should our other readers).[[User:Tlhslobus\|Tlhslobus]] ([[User talk:Tlhslobus\|talk]]) 13:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program: Difference between revisions