Revision as of 17:13, 23 December 2015 edit C-randles (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,262 edits →Maintenance + unmanned: no moon plans but inconceivable ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:17, 23 December 2015 edit undo The Anome (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 260,152 edits →What happens to Falcon 9 Flight 20's booster now?: :We seem to have our answer: [http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/21/10642028/spacex-falcon-9-landing-elon-musk-wont-fly]. It looks like it's going to be taken away from the landing site, refueled and s Next edit →
Line 91: == What happens to Falcon 9 Flight 20's booster now? == After its landing, I'd imagine that Falcon 9 Flight 20's booster will now be torn down by SpaceX into its component parts for analysis, but that's just my guess. Do we have any authoritative/[[WP:RS]] information about what SpaceX's plans are for this? -- [[User:The Anome\|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome\|talk]]) 12:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC) :We seem to have our answer: [http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/21/10642028/spacex-falcon-9-landing-elon-musk-wont-fly]. It looks like it's going to be taken away from the landing site, refueled and static fired once, then dismantled for analysis. -- [[User:The Anome\|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome\|talk]]) 22:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC) == Maintenance + unmanned ==

Talk:SpaceX reusable launch system development program: Difference between revisions