Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17:
==Methodological considerations==
Fascinated by the new technology, many users within the school environment focused on technological issues,
Whole-class teaching, which was a feature of early CALL - because scools could only afford one computer per classroom - is now making a comeback with the introduction of interactive whiteboards.
Generally speaking, CALL pedagogy and methodology continues to lag behind the technology.▼
▲Generally speaking, however, CALL pedagogy and methodology
==The current situation==
Line 29 ⟶ 31:
CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning) journal, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, Oxfordshire.
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/
Davies G.D. (1997) "Lessons from the past, lessons for the future: 20 years of CALL". In Korsvold A-K. & Rüschoff B. (eds.) New technologies in language learning and teaching, Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Also on the Web at:
http://www.camsoftpartners.co.uk/coegdd1.htm
Egbert, Joy, and Hanson-Smith, Elizabeth. (Eds.)
Felix U. (2001) Beyond Babel: language learning online, Melbourne: Language Australia.
Line 38 ⟶ 42:
Fotos & Browne (2004) New Perspectives on CALL for Second Language Classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Levy M. (1997) CALL: context and conceptualisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Language Learning and Technology: A specialist CALL journal available only on the Web: http://llt.msu.edu
ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, now published by Cambridge University Press - login at http://www.journals.cup.org. Back numbers are available at: http://www.eurocall-languages.org/ecpubs.htm
|