Revision as of 00:45, 15 February 2016 edit RJGray (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 15,564 edits →Requested move 13 February 2016: Comparing suggested title to current title using Wikipedia:Article titles ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:37, 15 February 2016 edit undo Trovatore (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 39,125 edits →Requested move 13 February 2016: r Next edit →
Line 64: I guess my feeling is Cantor got stuck with a poor title for his paper. I don't think we need to get stuck with the same obscure title.--[[User:RJGray\|RJGray]] ([[User talk:RJGray\|talk]]) 00:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC) ::The article is about a published work, so we go with the title of that work. I don't know any exception to that. If you had made it about the ''content'', then there would be more options, but you made it about the paper itself, so I think there is really only one choice. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore\|talk]]) 05:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Cantor's first set theory article: Difference between revisions