Talk:Cantor's first set theory article: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:37, 15 February 2016

Revision as of 01:40, 16 February 2016

Line 65:

I guess my feeling is Cantor got stuck with a poor title for his paper. I don't think we need to get stuck with the same obscure title.--[[User:RJGray|RJGray]] ([[User talk:RJGray|talk]]) 00:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

::The article is about a published work, so we go with the title of that work. I don't know any exception to that. If you had made it about the ''content'', then there would be more options, but you made it about the paper itself, so I think there is really only one choice. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 05:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

:: I am inclined to keep the present title. @Trovatore: Have you attempted to find out which articles on published works exist on Wikipedia and examine them to see whether some Wikipedia article titles differ from the titles of the published works? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 01:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)