Talk:Cantor's first set theory article: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
On suggested move: new section
On suggested move: not sure I follow
Line 74:
 
{{about|the paper|theorems proved in this paper|Gödel's incompleteness theorems}}
 
:I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Are you saying there's a disanalogy because this article is (currently) more about the content than about the paper per se? If so, then the title should refer to the content, and not to the published work; it currently refers to the published work.
:But really I don't think the content of the paper is a very natural topic for an article, given the divergent character of the two results. I think we ''should'' have an article about the paper, and I think it should be named after the paper, and it should spend more time on the paper per se than it currently does. (For example, currently, the article doesn't even seem to give the journal in which the paper was published, which I believe was ''[[Crelle's Journal]]''.) --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 21:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)