Objection to the consideration of a question: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
added section "Improper use of tabling a motion"
BG19bot (talk | contribs)
m WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #16. Remove invisible Unicode characters. Do general fixes if a problem exists. -, replaced: → (3) using AWB (11914)
Line 1:
{{About|a motion in parliamentary procedure|other uses of "Objection"|Objection}}
__NOTOC__
 
{{About|a motion in parliamentary procedure|other uses of "Objection"|Objection}}In [[parliamentary procedure]], an '''objection to the consideration of a question''' is a [[Motion (parliamentary procedure)|motion]] that is adopted to prevent an original [[main motion]] from coming before the [[Deliberative assembly|assembly]]. This motion is different from an objection to a [[unanimous consent]] request.
 
==Explanation and Use==
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
 
== Improper use of tabling a motion ==
Using the rules in RONR, a main motion is improperly killed by  [[Table (parliamentary procedure)|tabling]]  it.  In this case, before debate has begun, it would have been proper to make an objection to the consideration of the question.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html#13|title = Frequently Asked Questions about RONR (Question 13)|date = 2011|access-date = 2016-02-19|website = The Official Robert's Rules of Order Web Site|publisher = The Robert's Rules Association|last = Robert III|first = Henry M.}}</ref>
 
== See also ==