Revision as of 07:08, 29 September 2014 edit Christian75 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 117,720 edits Assessment: +Computer science (assisted) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:58, 22 February 2016 edit undo MaxEnt (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,492 edits →AfD candidate surely (or prompt rescue project): new section Next edit →
Line 174: : I deprodded because at first glance, there are references independent of Hewitt. Merge sounds like a good idea if these independent refs turn out to be bogus. Feel free to bring this to AfD if notability is a concern. But non-neutrality of the prose by itself is a cause for editing and balancing, not deletion, if the sources are there to improve it. --[[User:Mark viking\|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking\|talk]]) 22:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC) == AfD candidate surely (or prompt rescue project) == Uh, someone knowledgeable needs to decide whether it's tendentious overreach to motivate an entire typology of concurrent computation on the seldom-observed [[Buridan's ass]] (see specifically [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/lamport/pubs/buridan.pdf Buridan's Principle]) and ''then'' this article needs to be made comprehensible in a proper Wikipedia idiom, or it needs to die in a fire, with no in between. — [[user:MaxEnt\|MaxEnt]] 22:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Indeterminacy in concurrent computation: Difference between revisions