Revision as of 00:19, 10 January 2016 edit Aisteco (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 18,361 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:10, 7 March 2016 edit undo Headbomb (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 473,403 edits →Test Procedures: Journal of Testing and Evaluation Next edit →
Line 44: * The ability of a container to protect the contents from compression damage * etc. The dynamic loads have some relationship with expected field loads.:<ref>{{cite journal \|last=Burgess \|first=G\|authorlink= \|author2=Singh, Srinagyam \|date=July 2005 \|title=Predicting Collapse Times for Corrugated Boxes Under Top Load\|journal=~~Astm~~Journal of Testing and Evaluation ~~Jte~~\|volume=33 \|issue=4 \|pages= \|id=\|url= \|accessdate= \|quote= }}</ref> often factors of 4 or 5 are used to estimate the allowable working load on boxes. A test can also be conducted with platens that are not mechanically driven but are free to move with a fixed mass (or fixed force) loaded upon them. The results of static load testing can be:

Container compression test: Difference between revisions