Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings/Design guidelines: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added hist merge |
m Anthony Appleyard moved page User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/User talk namespace/Design guidelines to Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings/Design guidelines without leaving a redirect: histmerge |
||
Line 1:
{{Userspace draft|date=March 2011}}
{{PageTabs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|[[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace/Meta-templates|View all meta-templates]]
| This={}▼
|[[User:Pol430/Sandbox/User talk namespace/Related policies|Related policies]]
}}
<br
{{shortcut|WP:UWDG}}
{{notice|''Before designing a new template, please check that it, or one like it, does not already exist. If you are unsure
{{policy in a nutshell|All standardized user talk namespace templates should meet the guidelines set out on this page.|align=center}}
Line 25 ⟶ 28:
There are different severity levels for templates. All multi-level templates include several levels of increasing severity. The tone of these varies, from kindly, to very stern. These templates don't necessarily have to be followed in chronological order; a user may use any level of their choice; based on the severity desired. For example, the test series is test1, test2, test3, test4. The number of levels for any given template depends, on the editing actions in question.
====Multi-level templates for vandalism====
There are 4 levels of template for editing actions that can be considered [[WP:VANDAL|vandalism]]. For editing actions that can include severe, or gross examples of vandalism, a '''level 4im''' template is also included in the template series.
*
*
*
*
*
====Multi-level templates for disruptive editing====
It is important to remember that [[WP:DISRUPT|disruptive editing]] is not [[WP:VANDAL|vandalism]]. Although it may be appropriate to warn disruptive editors, it is not appropriate to report them as vandals at [[WP:AIV|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. Instead, you should consider the nature of the disruptive editing. If the edits relate to obvious disruption that is not properly defined as vandalism, it may be appropriate to report them to [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. If the nature of the disruptive editing appears to be a content dispute, and an editor continues to engage in such edits, after a level 3 warning; consideration can be given to reporting the matter at a [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant noticeboard]].
*
*
*
====Single issue notices====
====Single issue warnings====
There are also single issue warnings. Single issue warnings generally serve to advise editors of policy breaches that; if repeated, are likely to result in a block. An example of such an act would be [[WP:Edit war|edit warring]].
Line 50 ⟶ 53:
===Civility===
{{see also|Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers|Wikipedia:Civility|Wikipedia:Etiquette}}
Regardless of the severity level of the template, any user warning should be a model of civility (even for the most destructive vandal). Remember than when you use a warning template, you
===Language===
Line 59 ⟶ 62:
* [[Colloquialism]]s should be avoided in all templates.
=====Block advisories=====
* Generally speaking, block advisories should appear at the end of the template text.
* It is appropriate to make reference to [[WP:Blocking policy|blocking]] in Level 3, Level 4 and Level 4im templates as well as in single issue warnings. Level 2 templates often include reference to the blocking policy but the wording is much less strong; for example, Level 2 templates often include text similar to "Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges." Level 1 and single issue notices, should not include reference to the blocking policy.
Line 97 ⟶ 100:
<pre>
[[{{{link|{{{1|
</pre>
Line 128 ⟶ 131:
--><p>Paragraph 3.</p>
</pre>
|