Content deleted Content added
Line 107:
:::The concepts of [[Design by Contract]] are central to Eiffel. The keyword in that case is no longer <code><font color=blue>'''require'''</font></code> but <code><font color=blue>'''require else'''</font></code>.
::'''All''' wikipedia programming articles follow the convention of black-in-<code><code></code> for keywords etc discussed in the text. That this article should not will ruffle feathers and is, above all, unnessesary and superfluous. When I look at a painting I want to see the colours. When I read a critical review of it I do not want it written in matching colours. Also, think about the wether to use bold and italics in the text, the current libera use, while mirroring the constructs in the code examples, are again if not confusing then at elast contributing to the garishness. <code>Just plain, unadorned code will do in the text regardless of example formatting</code>. [[User:Mikademus|Mikademus]] 22:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
::Adding another note when on the topic, every so often there are links inside code-tags, like <code>#include <[[iostream]]></code>. Considering that, I assume you see the unreasonableness of colouring the text itself. [[User:Mikademus|Mikademus]] 22:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
| |||