Transformation between distributions in time–frequency analysis: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Transformation between distributions: primes should not be superscripts |
Cuzkatzimhut (talk | contribs) Offensiively wrong/subversive wikilink removal . |
||
Line 1:
In the field of [[time–frequency analysis]], several signal formulations are used to represent the signal in a joint time–frequency ___domain.<ref>L. Cohen, "Time–Frequency Analysis," ''Prentice-Hall'', New York, 1995. ISBN 978-0135945322</ref>
There are several methods and transforms called "time-frequency distributions" (TFDs), whose interconnections were organized by Leon Cohen.<ref>
<ref>L. Cohen, "Quantization Problem and Variational Principle in the Phase Space Formulation of Quantum Mechanics," ''
The most useful and popular methods form a class referred to as "quadratic" or [[bilinear time–frequency distribution]]s. A core member of this class is the [[Wigner–Ville distribution]] (WVD), as all other TFDs can be written as a smoothed or convolved versions of the WVD. Another popular member of this class is the [[spectrogram]] which is the square of the magnitude of the [[short-time Fourier transform]] (STFT). The spectrogram has the advantage of being positive and is easy to interpret, but also has disadvantages, like being irreversible, which means that once the spectrogram of a signal is computed, the original signal can't be extracted from the spectrogram. The theory and methodology for defining a TFD that verifies certain desirable properties is given in the "Theory of Quadratic TFDs".<ref>B. Boashash, “Theory of Quadratic TFDs”, Chapter 3, pp. 59–82, in B. Boashash, editor, Time-Frequency Signal Analysis & Processing: A Comprehensive Reference, Elsevier, Oxford, 2003; ISBN 0-08-044335-4.</ref>
|