Talk:Object Module Format (Intel): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 6:
 
==Is this talking about the same standard?==
* [https://books.google.com.au/books?id=3KBPxFKTY6kC&lpg=PA35&ots=xsQ85D75Io&dq=Xitan%20Neil%20Colvin&pg=PA35#v=onepage&q=Xitan%20Neil%20Colvin&f=false Phoenix chief: to clone or not to clone?] By Ed Scannell, Page 35, 1987-05-18, Computerworld, ''Neil Colvin, chief executive officer and chief scientist at ... He was also a cofounder of Xitan, which developed various operating''</ref><ref>[https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1977-11-rescan/1977_11_BYTE_02-11_Memory_Mapped_IO#page/n199/mode/2up/search/tdl Technical Forum:Technical Design Labs Relocatable Object Module Code Format], Volume 02 Number 11, November 1977, Byte Magazine, ''..format used by Technical Design Labs, originated by Neil Colvin. This text was given to us at the TDL booth at the National Computer
Conference in Dallas last June, and offered as documentation of a standard which is in use by that firm, and is reportedly being examined for adoption by two other major software vendors in the personal computing marketplace.''
[[User:So-retro-it-hurts|So-retro-it-hurts]] ([[User talk:So-retro-it-hurts|talk]]) 04:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
~~~~