Content deleted Content added
KennyHBrown (talk | contribs) added content on Austin's use of 'descriptive fallacy' to expand stub article |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
{{merge to|Analytic-synthetic distinction}}The '''descriptive fallacy''' refers to reasoning which treats a [[speech act]] as a [[logical proposition]], which would be mistaken when the meaning of the statement is not based on its [[truth condition]].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405106795_chunk_g97814051067955_ss1-69 |encyclopedia=The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy |title=Descriptive fallacy |editor-first=Nicholas |editor-last=Bunnin |editor2-first=Jiyuan |editor2-last=Yu |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-4051-0679-5}}</ref> It was suggested by the British philosopher of language [[J. L. Austin]] in 1955 in the lectures now known as ''[[How to Do Things With Words]]''. Austin argued that [[performative utterance]]s are not meaningfully evaluated as true or false but rather by other measures, which would hold that a statement such as "thank you" is not meant to describe a fact and to interpret it as such would be to commit the descriptive fallacy.
==Role of ‘descriptive fallacy’ in Austin’s philosophy==
| |||