Revision as of 17:10, 2 April 2016 edit Edris356 (talk \| contribs) 6 edits Corrected one word from pseudoscience to science because there is not enough evidence that " irreducible complexity" is false. Changing this back to "pseudoscience" is clear evidence that you are biased against Intelligent Design (ID). Just consider th... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:13, 2 April 2016 edit undo Hy Brasil (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 8,546 edits Undid revision 713210814 by Edris356 (talk) revert non neutral edit Next edit →
Line 2: {{Intelligent Design}} '''Irreducible complexity''' ('''IC''') is a [[~~science~~pseudoscience\|~~scientific~~pseudoscientific]] argument that certain [[biological system]]s cannot [[evolution\|evolve]] by successive small modifications to pre-existing functional systems through [[natural selection]].<ref>{{cite book \|last= Forrest \|first= Barbara \|author-link= Barbara Forrest \|url= http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf \|format= PDF \|title= Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals. A Position Paper from the Center for Inquiry, Office of Public Policy \|date= May 2007 \|publisher= Center for Inquiry, Inc. \|place= Washington, D.C. \|accessdate= 2007-08-22 \|ref= harv}}. {{cite book \|last= Smith \|first= Jonathan C. \|title= Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker's Toolkit \|page= 307 \|isbn= 1-40518-122-2 \|ref= harv}} *{{cite book \|last= Shermer \|first= Michael \|title= The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience \|publisher= ABC-CLIO \|___location= Santa Barbara \|year= 2002 \|isbn= 1-57607-653-9 \|page= 450 \|ref= harv}}

Irreducible complexity: Difference between revisions