Revision as of 20:25, 14 July 2006 edit CBM (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 55,390 edits Invalid definition of r.e. set ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:20, 23 August 2006 edit undo 200.215.11.134 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 45: [[User:CMummert\|CMummert]] 20:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC) == Equivalent definitions? == I can't see how both definitions can be considered "equivalent". I can see how, having an algorithm that enumerates the set, I can have another algorithm that, given an input number, eventually halts iff the element is in the set. But I can't see how, having such an algorithm, I could possibly enumerate the elements of the set. -- Anonymous, 13:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Computably enumerable set: Difference between revisions