Content deleted Content added
Cuchullain (talk | contribs) →Requested move 13 February 2016: Closing - result was move. |
→A replacement for the removed sentence: new section |
||
Line 371:
:Those are standard Harvard citations and the sources are listed at the end, so it is clear enough to me what the references point to. There seems to be an entire section of the article related to this issue, with numerous sources. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 15:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
== A replacement for the removed sentence ==
Thanks to Carl and William M. Connolley for their insightful comments on the sentence that has been removed. I wrote that sentence and now regard it as poorly written. So I'm pleased that it was removed. However, a sentence is needed here because a lead should mention all topics covered in an article.
With the aid of Carl and William's comments, I wrote a new sentence that eliminates two flaws. First, the new sentence just mentions the analysis of Cantor's article and not its conclusion. It's not the job of the lead to announce the conclusion of a detailed analysis. Later, the article discusses this conclusion and the disagreement about Cantor's proof. Second, I've added a reference to an article containing an analysis similar to the one presented in this Wikipedia article. --[[User:RJGray|RJGray]] ([[User talk:RJGray|talk]]) 21:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
| |||