Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Patafunctions: del NN |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 11:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Patafunctions]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
* '''Delete''' - I was going to write something about the [[exegesis]] of [[culture|cultural]] [[hermeneutics]] in [[existential]] [[artist]]ico-[[metaphysical]] [[dialogue]], but decided simply to say that [[WP:BOLLOCKS|a load of nonsense]] wrapped up with a few [[primary source]]s and a link to [[De Chirico|a dead artist]]'s work doesn't add up to [[WP:N|notability]]. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 14:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
'''Keep''' but NPOV with criticism from supporters and detractors: Judd's article is for: https://www.artlink.com.au/articles/4334/shaun-gladwell-the-lacrima-chair-collection2B/ Whereas MacDonald is totally against
http://johnmcdonald.net.au/2015/shaun-gladwell/ [[User:Zenopharmakon|Zenopharmakon]] ([[User talk:Zenopharmakon|talk]]) 00:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
|