Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:29, 26 April 2016

Revision as of 23:32, 26 April 2016

Line 17:

http://johnmcdonald.net.au/2015/shaun-gladwell/ [[User:Zenopharmakon|Zenopharmakon]] ([[User talk:Zenopharmakon|talk]]) 00:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

::'''Comment'''[[User:Zenopharmakon|Zenopharmakon]]: with respect, the two refs you mention are not very strong. The first is one sentence, and the second is two sentences and it does not even mention "Patafunctions" directly, just obliquely. The second is very fine writing that would fit very nicely into the main article. [[User:HappyValleyEditor|HappyValleyEditor]] ([[User talk:HappyValleyEditor|talk]]) 18:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

[[User:HappyValleyEditor|HappyValleyEditor]], I'm all for inclusion of the John McDonald criticism within the article itself. McDonald is a very powerful voice in Australian Art Criticism and criticallyseems engagesto Gladwellenjoy oncritically everyengaging/demolishing majorGladwell. public offering the artist makes in Australia. McDonald's comments also intended to be included in Gladwell's bio under thea "criticisms" section,. however, But I'm no longer editing the page(s) before working out COI issues. [[User:Gladderz|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz|talk]]) 23:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)