Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18:
::'''Comment'''[[User:Zenopharmakon|Zenopharmakon]]: with respect, the two refs you mention are not very strong. The first is one sentence, and the second is two sentences and it does not even mention "Patafunctions" directly, just obliquely. The second is very fine writing that would fit very nicely into the main article. [[User:HappyValleyEditor|HappyValleyEditor]] ([[User talk:HappyValleyEditor|talk]]) 18:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
[[User:HappyValleyEditor|HappyValleyEditor]], I'm all for inclusion of the John McDonald criticism within the article itself. McDonald is a very powerful voice in Australian art criticism and seems to enjoy critically engaging/demolishing Gladwell. McDonald's comments also intended to be included in Gladwell's bio under a "criticisms" section. However, I'm no longer editing the page(s) before working out COI issues. [[User:Gladderz|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz|talk]]) 23:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
::'''Comment''' This article features the clearest description of this book/artwork but cannot be used due to its Author's COI and clear disclosure statement. Kit Messham-Muir is the self appointed 'official' Gladwell biographer/interlocuter/collaborator. http://theconversation.com/shaun-gladwell-is-returning-to-sydney-and-may-not-shed-tears-37348 Other forums are debating the books content rather than seeing it as an artwork etc. [[User:Gladderz|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz|talk]]) 12:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
| |||