Revision as of 12:55, 27 April 2016 edit Gladderz (talk \| contribs) 442 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:56, 27 April 2016 edit undo Gladderz (talk \| contribs) 442 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 19: [[User:HappyValleyEditor\|HappyValleyEditor]], I'm all for inclusion of the John McDonald criticism within the article itself. McDonald is a very powerful voice in Australian art criticism and seems to enjoy critically engaging/demolishing Gladwell. McDonald's comments also intended to be included in Gladwell's bio under a "criticisms" section. However, I'm no longer editing the page(s) before working out COI issues. [[User:Gladderz\|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz\|talk]]) 23:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC) ::'''Comment''' This article features the clearest description of this book/artwork but cannot be used due to its Author's COI and ~~clear~~clearly placed disclosure statement at the top of the article. Kit Messham-Muir is the self appointed 'official' Gladwell biographer/interlocuter/collaborator. http://theconversation.com/shaun-gladwell-is-returning-to-sydney-and-may-not-shed-tears-37348 Other forums are debating the books content rather than seeing it as an artwork etc. [[User:Gladderz\|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz\|talk]]) 12:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)▼ ▲::'''Comment''' This article features the clearest description of this book/artwork but cannot be used due to its Author's COI and clear disclosure statement. Kit Messham-Muir is the self appointed 'official' Gladwell biographer/interlocuter/collaborator. http://theconversation.com/shaun-gladwell-is-returning-to-sydney-and-may-not-shed-tears-37348 Other forums are debating the books content rather than seeing it as an artwork etc. [[User:Gladderz\|Gladderz]] ([[User talk:Gladderz\|talk]]) 12:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunctions: Difference between revisions