Revision as of 18:06, 27 April 2016 edit David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 235,850 edits k ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:45, 29 April 2016 edit undo Wcherowi (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 13,260 edits keep Next edit →
Line 9: :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Canada\|list of Canada-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal\|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal\|talk]]) 15:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)</small> '''Keep'''. I expanded the article with a primary source for its history and a couple of secondary sources. It appears to be the top journal on mathematical problem-solving, so I think it passes [[WP:NJournal]] #1 and #3. —[[User:David Eppstein\|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein\|talk]]) 18:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC) '''Keep'''. I agree with David Eppstein. This is a very special journal, but because it does not publish original research, it will not pop up in the usual places that we use for notability checking. [[User:Wcherowi\|Bill Cherowitzo ]] ([[User talk:Wcherowi\|talk]]) 16:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crux Mathematicorum: Difference between revisions