Revision as of 01:56, 19 November 2013 edit Trombonechamp (talk \| contribs) 31 edits m an to a ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:49, 30 April 2016 edit undo Calrad (talk \| contribs) 18 edits Paul Thagard's opinion of CRUM is not definitive; quote needed citation to his argument and ref to other researchers. Next edit →
Line 3: CRUM takes into consideration several theoretical approaches of understanding human [[cognition]], including [[logic]], [[:wikt:rule\|rule]], [[concept]], [[analogy]], image, and connection based systems. These serve as the representation aspects of CRUM theory which are then acted upon to simulate certain aspects of human cognition, such as the use of [[rule-based systems]] in [[neuroeconomics]]. There is much disagreement on this hypothesis, but CRUM has ~~been~~high ''regard among some researchers {{citation needed\|reason=Need link to sources\|date=April 2016}}. Philosopher [[Paul Thagard]] called it "the most theoretically and experimentally successful approach to mind ever developed''" ~~([[Paul~~{{citation ~~Thagard]],~~needed\|reason=Source of quote missing\|date=April ~~2005)~~2016}}. ==See also==

Computational-representational understanding of mind: Difference between revisions