Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMS (statistical method): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
d
Line 7:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mathematics|list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:NewYorkActuary|NewYorkActuary]] ([[User talk:NewYorkActuary|talk]]) 01:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Based only on a single primary source in a journal of dubious quality that has been cited only once, by its own authors. [[WP:TOOSOON]] to have gained any academic impact. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 21:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. [[WP:OR]] at its best. Note that the creator also [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outlier&diff=prev&oldid=677937311 modified] the article [[Outlier]] with a series of (not really) minor edits to add this method in there. I advocate deleting the resulting mention there as well. [[User:Tigraan|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#008000;">Tigraan</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tigraan|<span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me</span>]]</sup> 10:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)