Revision as of 10:50, 2 May 2016 edit Tigraan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,147 edits →MMS (statistical method): d ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:48, 4 May 2016 edit undo Happysquirrel (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 4,915 edits →MMS (statistical method): delete Next edit →
Line 8: '''Delete'''. Based only on a single primary source in a journal of dubious quality that has been cited only once, by its own authors. [[WP:TOOSOON]] to have gained any academic impact. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. —[[User:David Eppstein\|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein\|talk]]) 21:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC) '''Delete'''. [[WP:OR]] at its best. Note that the creator also [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outlier&diff=prev&oldid=677937311 modified] the article [[Outlier]] with a series of (not really) minor edits to add this method in there. I advocate deleting the resulting mention there as well. [[User:Tigraan\|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#008000;">Tigraan</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Tigraan\|<span title="Send me a silicium letter!" style="color:">Click here to contact me</span>]]</sup> 10:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Not quite OR since it has been published elsewhere. However, also not notable (yet). If it does become notable in the future, we don't want the article tainted with COI and advocacy. [[user:Happysquirrel\|Happy Squirrel]] ([[user talk:Happysquirrel\|talk]]) 02:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMS (statistical method): Difference between revisions